Factors Influencing Compliance Among Indonesian Construction Service Business Entities: A Systematic Literature Review

Agus Gendroyono; Agus Taufik Mulyono; Oei Fuk Jin; Endah Murtiana Sari

doi:10.51988/jtsc.v7i3.592

Authors

Agus Gendroyono Doktor Ilmu Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Tarumanagara
Agus Taufik Mulyono Department Teknik Sipil Universitas Gadjah Mada
Oei Fuk Jin Doktor Ilmu Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Tarumanagara
Endah Murtiana Sari Industrial engineering Department, Universitas Sains Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51988/jtsc.v7i3.592

Keywords:

Construction Service Business Entities, Compliance, Construction Industry, Regulatory Compliance, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Compliance among Construction Service Business Entities (CSBEs) is essential for ensuring the delivery of safe, high-quality, and legally compliant construction projects while strengthening governance within the construction industry. Despite continuous regulatory reforms in Indonesia, maintaining consistent compliance among CSBEs remains a significant challenge due to the interaction of regulatory, organizational, and external factors. This study aims to identify and synthesize the factors influencing the compliance level of Indonesian Construction Service Business Entities through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and systematically searched publications indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Taylor & Francis Online, Emerald Insight, Google Scholar, Garuda, and SINTA published between 2015 and 2025. A total of 486 records were initially identified. After duplicate removal and eligibility screening, 52 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. The selected studies were analyzed using content analysis and thematic synthesis to identify the dominant determinants of organizational compliance. The findings reveal nine principal factors influencing compliance, namely regulatory framework, government supervision and enforcement, human resource competency, organizational capacity, financial capability, information technology adoption, organizational culture, management commitment, and safety and environmental factors. Among these, regulatory quality, government supervision, human resource competency, and management commitment consistently emerged as the most influential determinants reported across the reviewed studies. This review provides a comprehensive conceptual framework that supports policymakers, researchers, and construction industry stakeholders in strengthening compliance strategies, improving governance systems, and enhancing the sustainability and competitiveness of Indonesia's construction sector.

References

W. Bank, Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. Washington, DC: World Bank, doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1440-2.

OECD, Regulatory Compliance and Enforcement Framework. 2021, in OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/5b28b589-en.

Peraturan Menteri PPN/Kepala Bappenas, Peraturan Menteri PPN/Kepala Bappenas Nomor 8 Tahun 2023, 2023 tentang Perubahan atas Rencana Strategis Kementerian PPN/Bappenas Tahun 2020–2024, pp. 1–19.

G. Ofori, 2015 “Nature of the construction industry and its needs,” Construction Management and Economics.

M. , & M. N. Loosemore, 2019 “Safety training and positive safety attitude in construction,” Saf. Sci.

P. E. D. Love, P. Teo, and J. Morrison, 2018 “Revisiting Quality Failure Costs in Construction,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 144, no. 2, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001427.

M. Gunduz and H. A. Elsherbeny, 2020 “Operational Framework for Managing Construction-Contract Administration Practitioners’ Perspective through Modified Delphi Method,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 146, no. 3, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001768.

UU No.2 tahun 2017,2017, “Jasa Konstruksi,” Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, pp. 1–96, Jan. 2017.

Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 14 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Jasa Konstruksi. 2021.

C. , & N. V. L. Parker,2017, “Compliance: 14 Questions. Regulation & Governance.,”.

J. , B. K. , & M. M. Alm, 2019 “On the external validity of tax compliance experiments. Economic Inquiry.,” Econ. Inq., 2019.

B. G. , S. M. , & S. N. N. Hwang, 2022,“Construction safety and compliance management.,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag.

R. M. , F. D. , & M. S. Choudhry, 2018,“The nature of safety culture in construction projects.,” Saf. Sci.

Y. Pan and L. Zhang, 2021 “Roles of artificial intelligence in construction engineering and management: A critical review and future trends,” Autom. Constr., vol. 122, p. 103517, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103517.

& S. C. Barbara Kitchenham, 2007, “Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering (Version 2.3).,” Keele University and Durham University Joint Report, EBSE Technical Report. Keele, United Kingdom: Keele University.

Hannah Snyder., 2019, “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, pp. 333–339.

Page, 2021 “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, 372, n71, pp. 1–72.

D. D. & P. S. David Tranfield, 2003, “Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review,” British Journal of Management, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 207–222.

I. Ayres and J. Braithwaite, 1992 “Oxford Socio-Legal Studies Responsive Regulation.

G. M. A. , X. Q. , & H. X. Nini Xia, 2022“Antecedents of workplace safety behavior: Meta-analysis in the construction industry,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 148, no. 7.

W. Richard Scott, 2014, “Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities,” SAGE Publications., vol. 4, no. 1.

Dominic Cooper, 2016 “Navigating the Safety Culture Construct: A Review of the Evidence,” Saf. Sci., vol. 82, pp. 315–326.