Comparative Analysis Of Hammer Test And Compression Testing Machine Against Normal Concrete Compressive Strength Test K300

Authors

  • Vicky Putra Anugrah Pratama Teknik Sipil Institut Teknologi Nasional Yogyakarta
  • Retnowati Setioningsih Teknik Sipil Institut Teknologi Nasional Yogyakarta
  • Marwanto Teknik Sipil Institut Teknologi Nasional Yogyakarta

Keywords:

Compressive Strength Test, Compression Test Machine Hammer Test, K300 Concrete, Non-destructive

Abstract

The materials used in a concrete construction have a major impact on its strength. But a lot of other things also matter, like the cement-water ratio (FAS), temperature fluctuations, curing conditions, and lack of compaction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the findings of compressive strength testing of K-300 quality concrete using two different approaches: the non-destructive Hammer Test (HT) and the destructive Compression Test Machine (CTM). Both techniques were used to examine ten cube-shaped concrete samples that were 15 cm x 15 cm x 15 cm. The two approaches differed significantly, according to the results. Compressive strength values ??from CTM were consistently higher than those from HT. Test specimen number 7 showed that CTM had the highest compressive strength at 507.92 kg/cm², while test specimen number 10 showed that HT had the highest compressive strength at 247kg/cm². These findings suggest that in order to get more accurate results, CTM should be used in concrete testing

References

Angga, Ronny & Steenie. (2018).Comparison of Compressive Strength Using Hammer Test on Reinforced Concrete Portal Test Objects and Using Compressive Strength Test Machine on Cube Test Objects. Sam Ratulangi University

Anonymous. (2004). SNI 15-2049-2004 Portland Cement. Standardization AgencyNational

ASTM C 805 (North American Standard). Standard Test Method for Rebound Number of Hardened Concrete. USA: ASTM International

Bai, Y., et al. (2024). Rail Pad Damping Characteristics in Track Vibration Reduction Evaluated Through Hammer Tests and Theoretical Analysis. Measurement 239, 1-18

Baiq. (2018). Analysis of Influence Humidity of Test Objects on Strength Concrete Splitting Tensile Strength and Compression High Quality with Method Destructive and Non Destructive Tests (Compression Testing Machine and Hammer Test). University of Mataram

Brencich, A., et al. (2021). Compressive Strength of Solid Clay Brickwork of Masonry Bridges: Estimate Through Schmidt Hammer Tests. Construction and Building Materials 306, 1-8

El-Mir, A., et al. (2023). Machine Learning Prediction of Concrete Compressive Strength Using Rebound Hammer Test. Journal of Building Engineering 64, 1-21

Ghozali, I. (2015). Multivariate Analysis Application with SPSS Program. Semarang: Diponegoro University Publishing Agency

Indra, Lestyowati & Gatot. (2019). Study Concrete Compressive Strength After Burning Using Compression Test and Hammer Test. UniversityTanjungpura

Jozef, Z., et al. (2018). Hardness Testing of Polymer Concrete Castings by Schmidt Hammer. 2018 2nd International Conference on Nanomaterials and Biomaterials, 293-299

Kazemi, M., et al. (2019). Compressive Strength Assessment of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Using Schmidt Rebound Hammer and Core Testing. Construction and Building Materials 224, 630-638

Kumavat, H.R., Chandak, NR, & Patil, I.T. (2021). Factors Influencing the Performance of Rebound Hammer Used For Non-Destructive Testing of Cencrete Members: a Review. Case Studies in Construction Materials 14, 1-12

Mulyono, T. (2004). Concrete Technology.Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher

Saha, AS, & Amanat, KM (2021). Rebound Hammer Test to Predict in-Situ Strength of Concrete Using Recycled Concrete Aggregates, Brick Chips and Stone Chips. Construction and Building Materials 268, 1-15

Wang, M., & Wan, W. (2019). A New Emperical Formula For Evaluating Uniaxial Compressive Strength Using The Schmidt Hammer Test. International Journal of Rock Mechanies and Mining Sciences 123, 1-11

Xu, X., et al. (2024). Experimental and Numerical Study of Drop Hammer Test on Honeycomb Sandwich Panel Resistant to Rock Burst in Coal Mine Roadway. Structures 65, 1-17

Downloads

Published

2025-02-27

Issue

Section

Articles