A Comparative Study of Quantity and Scheduling Using 4D BIM and Conventional Methods in Column, Beam, and Slab Construction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51988/jtsc.v6i2.290Keywords:
BIM, Quantity, Deviation, SchedulingAbstract
Inadequacies in the conceptualization and assessment of construction scheduling frameworks can disrupt the epistemic continuity of project execution, thereby undermining procedural coherence and operational efficiency. Accurate and detailed material quantity planning is essential to ensure precise resource forecasting and the development of efficient and reliable construction schedules. This research investigates the role of methodological selection in the accuracy and efficiency of construction planning, with a particular emphasis on material quantification and scheduling outcomes through this comparative framework. The methodological approach undertaken in this study involves quantity surveying practices through the application of two modelling-based techniques, namely CAD-Revit and CAD-Conventional. For construction-shop drawing documentation as the primary data source, material quantities derived from each method serve as the basis for schedule development. This process culminates in the integration of 4D Building Information Modelling to facilitate the temporal visualisation of construction sequences, which supports a more comprehensive evaluation of the implications associated with each quantity derivation method on the accuracy of project planning. The comparative analysis of material quantities derived from the two methods revealed significant fluctuations, with the CAD-Revit approach demonstrating greater efficiency in material usage. This variation was further reflected in the scheduling outcomes, where the 4D BIM methodology indicated divergent timelines for the completion of structural component progress across different floors.
References
Alzarrad, M. A., Moynihan, G. P., Parajuli, A., & Mehra, M. (2021). 4D BIM Simulation Guideline For Construction Visualization and Analysis of Renovation Projects: A case study. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7, 617031. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.617031
Aprillia, E., & Putra, I. N. D. P. (2024). The Implementation of BIM Tekla Structure on Quantity Take Off for Structural Works of X Building Project. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 17(1), 13-22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.56444/jts.v17i1.1567
Aziz, R. M., Nasreldin, T. I., & Hashem, O. M. (2024). The Role of BIM as a Lean Tool in Design Phase. Journal of Engineering Applied Science, 71(1), 23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-023-00340-3
Candelario, A., García-Sanz-Calcedo, J., & Rodríguez, A. M. R. (2017). A Quantitative Analysis on the Feasibility of 4D Planning Graphic Systems Versus Conventional Systems in Building Projects. Sustainable Cities and Society, 35, 378-384. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.024
Chegu, A., & Hsieh, S.-H. (2019). Empirical Approach to Identify Operational Critical Success Factors for BIM Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 145(3), 04018140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001607
Doukari, O., Seck, B., & Greenwood, D. (2022). The Efficient Generation of 4D BIM Construction Schedules: A Case Study of The Nanterre 2 CESI Project in France. Frontiers in Built Environment, 8, 998309. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.998309
Gong, P., Zeng, N., Ye, K., & König, M. (2019). An Empirical Study on The Acceptance of 4D BIM in EPC Projects in China. Journal Sustainability, 11(5), 1316. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051316
Hadavi, P., & Tavakolan, M. (2018). 4D Modeling and BIM-Based Project Planning Using Constraint-Based Simulation for Implementation in Iran Considering an Actual Case Study. Paper presented at the Construction Research Congress, New Orleans, State of Louisiana.https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784481264.053
Hamledari, H., McCabe, B., Davari, S., & Shahi, A. (2017). Automated Schedule and Progress Updating of IFC-Based 4D BIMs. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 31(4), 04017012. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000660
Han, K. K., & Golparvar-Fard, M. (2015). Appearance-based Material Classification for Monitoring of Operation-level Construction Progress Using 4D BIM and Site Photologs. Journal Automation in Construction, 53, 44-57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.007
Haryati, S., & Hermawan, A. R. (2021). Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Struktur Atas dengan Beton Pracetak Pada Proyek Gedung. Construction and Material Journal, 3(2), 79-87. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.32722/cmj.v3i2.3901
Heigermoser, D., de Soto, B. G., Abbott, E. L. S., & Chua, D. K. H. J. A. i. C. (2019). BIM-based Last Planner System tool for improving construction project management. Journal Automation in Construction, 104, 246-254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.019
Indonesia, P. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat No 8 Tahun 2023. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/262345/permen-pupr-no-8-tahun-2023.
Khosakitchalert, C., Yabuki, N., & Fukuda, T. (2019). Improving the Accuracy of BIM-Based Quantity Takeoff for Compound Elements. Automation in Construction, 106, 102891. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102891
Liang, C., Lu, W., Rowlinson, S., & Zhang, X. (2016). Development of a Multifunctional BIM Maturity Model. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 142(11), 06016003. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001186
Lopez, R., Chong, H.-Y., Wang, X., & Graham, J. (2016). Technical Review: Analysis and Appraisal of Four-Dimensional Building Information Modeling Usability in Construction and Engineering Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 142(5), 06015005. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001094
Mirzaei, A., Nasirzadeh, F., Parchami Jalal, M., & Zamani, Y. (2018). 4D-BIM Dynamic Time–space Conflict Detection and Quantification System for Building Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 144(7), 04018056. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001504
Park, J., & Cai, H. (2017). WBS-based Dynamic Multi-dimensional BIM Database for Total Construction As-built Documentation. Journal Automation in Construction, 77, 15-23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.01.021
Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., & Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling For Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers: John Wiley & Sons.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119287568
Sampaio, A. Z., Fernandes, V., & Gomes, A. (2023). The Use of BIM-based Tools to Improve Collaborative Building Projects. Journal Procedia Computer Science, 219, 2027-2034. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.504
Sheikhkhoshkar, M., Rahimian, F. P., Kaveh, M. H., Hosseini, M. R., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). Automated Planning of Concrete Joint Layouts With 4D-BIM. Journal Automation in Construction, 107, 102943. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102943
Son, H., Kim, C., & Kwon Cho, Y. (2017). Automated Schedule Updates Ssing As-built Data and a 4D Building Information Model. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(4), 04017012. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000528
Stylianou, C., & Andreou, A. S. (2016). Investigating The Impact of Developer Productivity, Task Interdependence Type and Communication Overhead in a Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Software Project Planning. Journal Advances in Engineering Software, 98, 79-96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.04.001
Syamsuir, E., Wahyuni, F. I., Gusmulyani, G., Priyana, S. E., Vitri, G., Khatab, U., . . . Fitri, D. W. D. (2023). Manajemen Proyek: Penamuda Media.https://penarepository.com/id/eprint/44/1/EBOOK_removed-2.pdf
Utama, F. S., & Negara, P. K. W., I. (2024). Improving Knowledge Management Process Using BIM In Indonesian State-Owned Construction Enterprises. Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE), 05(01), 1-13. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.32722/arcee.v5i01.5774
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Teknik Sipil Cendekia (JTSC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.