ANALISIS PENGEMBANGAN INFRASTRUKTUR MENDUKUNG WISATA AIR ASOL. KAWASAN PULAU HARUKU, MALUKU : PENDEKATAN PERENCANAAN DAN PERANCANGAN DENGAN METODE AHP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51988/jtsc.v6i2.291Keywords:
Sustainable Tourism, Infrastructure Development, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Operational IndependenceAbstract
This study aims to analyze the development of supporting infrastructure for Asol Water Tourism in the Haruku Island area, Maluku, particularly in Negeri Oma, which possesses beautiful natural potential but is constrained by limited tourism facilities and infrastructure. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used to determine priority development criteria through analysis of pre-construction, construction, and post-construction aspects. The results show that the dominant criterion in the pre-construction aspect is construction engineering with consideration of building structure and the environment, with a priority weight of 0.578. In the construction aspect, the dominant criterion is the application of project control principles related to time, quality, and cost, with a weight of 0.091. Meanwhile, in the post-construction aspect, the dominant criterion is synergy through the involvement of communities, the private sector, and universities to achieve operational independence, with a weight of 0.1156. In conclusion, these three aspects are expected to significantly contribute to the development of high-quality and environmentally conscious tourism facilities and infrastructure for Asol Water Tourism.
References
Afdhal, A. (2023). Peran Perempuan dalam Perekonomian Lokal Melalui Ekowisata di Maluku: Tinjauan Sosio-Ekologi dan Sosio-Ekonomi. RESIPROKAL: Jurnal Riset Sosiologi Progresif Aktual, 5(2), 208–224.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Statistik Pariwisata Maluku Tengah.
Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (1993). Sustainable tourism: An evolving global approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1(1), 1–5.
Buckley, R. (2012). Sustainable tourism: Research and reality. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 528–546.
Christopher, J. (1992). Rational Design and Rational Planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 4(2), 89–102.
Gössling, S. (2002). Global environmental consequences of tourism. Global Environmental Change, 12(4), 283–302.
Hunter, C. (1997). Sustainable tourism as an adaptive paradigm. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4), 850–867.
Inskeep, E. (1991). Tourism planning: An integrated and sustainable development approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Mailoa, R. J., St K, O., & Rahanra, I. Y. (2023). Menggali Potensi Pariwisata: Inovasi Pariwisata dalam Meningkatkan Pendapatan Asli Desa. BAILEO: JURNAL SOSIAL HUMANIORA, 1(1), 28–39.
McCool, S. F., & Moisey, R. N. (2001). Tourism, recreation, and sustainability: Linking culture and the environment. Cabi.
Mowforth, M., & Munt, I. (2015). Tourism and sustainability: Development, globalisation and new tourism in the third world. routledge.
Nelson, F. (2012). Livelihoods, conservation and community-based tourism in Tanzania: Potential and performance. In Responsible Tourism (pp. 333–350). Routledge.
UNEP. (2005). Forging Links Between Protected Areas and the Tourism Sector: How Tourism Can Benefit Conservation. UNEP Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics.
Wall, G. (1997). Is ecotourism sustainable? Environmental Management, 21(4), 483–491.
Weaver, D. (2007). Sustainable tourism. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Teknik Sipil Cendekia (JTSC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.