WANPRESTASI DALAM KONTRAK KONSTRUKSI PROYEK PEMERINTAH YANG DIBIAYAI APBN/APBD

Yanti Yanti; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi; Dwi Edi

doi:10.51988/jtsc.v7i1.466

Authors

Yanti Yanti Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pekalongan Jalan Sriwijaya Pekalongan
Sarwono Hardjomuljadi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pekalongan Jalan Sriwijaya Pekalongan
Dwi Edi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pekalongan Jalan Sriwijaya Pekalongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51988/jtsc.v7i1.466

Keywords:

breach of contract, construction contract, government project, APBN/APBD, Supreme Court decision

Abstract

Construction contract disputes in government projects funded thru the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBN) and the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBD) are legal issues that frequently occur and have wide-ranging implications for public interests. One of the dominant forms of disputes is default in the execution of construction contracts, whether committed by the service provider or the service user. This research aims to analyze the characteristics of default in government project construction contracts and to examine the legal considerations of the Supreme Court in Decision Number 171 PK/PDT/2025. This research uses a normative legal research method with an approach based on legislation, conceptual, and case approaches. The scope of this research is limited to the analysis of default in construction contracts for government projects funded by the state budget (APBN/APBD) and the legal considerations of the Supreme Court at the review stage, without discussing the technical aspects of construction or the overall procurement process of goods and services. The research results show that default in government construction contracts has complex characteristics because it lies at the intersection of civil law and public law. The Supreme Court in that ruling consistently applied the principle of legal certainty and the principle of pacta sunt servanda by limiting the scope of the Review process to the aspect of law application. This decision has important implications in strengthening legal certainty and providing guidance for the parties involved in the implementation of construction contracts for government projects funded by the state budget (APBN/APBD).

References

Christiawan, R. (2020). Kepastian hukum dalam pelaksanaan kontrak konstruksi. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 9(2), 145–160.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2025). Putusan Nomor 171 PK/PDT/2025.

Ngadimin, N., Sidarta, S., & Lestari, R. (2023). Wanprestasi dalam kontrak pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Court Review: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 5(1), 33–49.

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah, sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2021.

Putra, R. A., Purba, J., Siregar, H., & Harianto, D. (2022). Asas keseimbangan dalam kontrak pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 101–115.

Ramadhani, A., Fahamsyah, E., & Ali, M. (2023). Perlindungan hukum bagi penyedia jasa konstruksi terhadap pemutusan kontrak sepihak. Equivalent: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik, 5(3), 210–224.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Jasa Konstruksi (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2017 Nomor 11).

Vaza, M., & Sami’an, S. (2024). Kewenangan pejabat pemerintah dalam pemutusan kontrak konstruksi. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(1), 87–98.