Peer Review Procces

  1. Manuscript Submission

    Each manuscript or research-based articles submitted will be examined by the Editorial Board in accordance with sub-fields of researches and in conformity with the format and guidelines of JTSC.

  2. Editor Evaluation

    Editors have a right to directly accept, reject, or review. Similarity checking by using Turnitin is applied for each manuscript. Manuscripts that considered have potential interest to our readership and eligible by the editor will be either returned to the author for revision or sent to the reviewers in a double-blind review. 

  3. Double-Blind Review Process

    In double-blind peer review, both the authors and reviewers keep their anonymity. Only the editor knows the identity of all parties involved. The reviewer is responsible for critiquing by reading and evaluating manuscripts in the field of expertise, then giving constructive advice and honest feedback to the author of the article submitted. Reviewer, discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the article, how to increase the strength, quality of the paper, evaluate the relevance and authenticity of the manuscript.

  4. Paper Revision (by Author)

    Author must show the major revisions in the text, either with a different color text, by highlighting the changes, or with Microsoft Word’s Track Changes feature. 

  5. Revision Submission based on Reviewer Suggestion (by author)

    Detail information of revision submission Open Journal System Guidelines.

  6. Editor Decision

    Notification of Manuscript Acceptance, Revision, or Rejection (by editor to author based on reviewers comments).

  7. Confirmation to the authors

    If reviewer seems to be satisfied with revision, notification for acceptance (by editor).

  8. Galley proof and publishing process