Effect Of Shear Wall Position Variations On The Seismic Response Of Reinforced Concrete Buildings: A Case Study Of Ristia Resort

Authors

  • Putu Didik Sulistiana Faculty of Engineering and Planning, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Bali 80239
  • I Gede Premananda Putra Faculty of Engineering and Planning, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Bali 80239
  • Cokorda Agung Yujana Faculty of Engineering and Planning, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Bali 80239
  • Anak Agung Sagung Dewi Rahadiani Faculty of Engineering and Planning, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Bali 80239

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51988/jtsc.v7i3.622

Keywords:

Shear Wall, Seismic Response, Reinforced Concrete, Inter-Story Drift, Story Stiffness

Abstract

The arrangement of shear walls plays a fundamental role in controlling the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete buildings by affecting lateral stiffness and structural deformation during earthquake loading. This study investigates the seismic performance of the Ristia Resort reinforced concrete building subjected to three alternative shear wall layouts. Three numerical structural models with identical geometry, material properties, loading conditions, and seismic design parameters were developed, with the shear wall locations defined as the only variable. Seismic performance was evaluated through response spectrum analysis based on SNI 1726:2019. The evaluation considered inter-story drift, story stiffness, and the proportion of design base shear carried by the shear wall system. Among the investigated configurations, Model 1 achieved the best structural performance by reducing the third-floor inter-story drift by 10.69% and 11.19% relative to Models 2 and 3, respectively. It also increased the average X-direction story stiffness by 6.38% and 6.48%, while the shear wall system resisted 66.74% and 71.08% of the design base shear in the X- and Y-directions, respectively. These results demonstrate that a symmetrical shear wall arrangement provides a more efficient lateral load-resisting system and improves the overall seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings.

References

S. Mahmoud, “In-Plane Shear-Wall Configuration Effects on the Seismic Performance of Symmetrical Multistory Reinforced-Concrete Buildings,” International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1195–1208, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40999-021-00634-8.

S. Anuda, N. A. Abdulrahman, and N. Z. N. Azizan, “A Review of Shear Wall Location Response in High-Rise RCC Structures as a Result of Earthquake Effect,” in Structural Integrity Cases in Mechanical and Civil Engineering, S. , K. S. S. S. , M. N. N. Abdullah, Ed., Springer, Cham, Jan. 2022, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85646-5_1.

A. Uma, K. Ullas, R. Shruthi, and B. J. Amith, “Seismic Analysis of a High-Rise RC Building with Varying Shear Wall Con?gurations using ETABS,” in 16th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies, ACT 2025, Mandya, India: Adichunchanagiri University, BGS Institute of Technology /Civil Engineering, 2025.

K. Pranava, A. R. Avinash, M. Chaithra, S. Anil, and K. Kamath, “Seismic Performance of Torsionally Irregular Multistorey RC Buildings with Optimised Shear Wall Configurations,” Infrastructures (Basel)., vol. 10, no. 11, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.3390/infrastructures10110296.

G. S. Sandeep, K. Y. M. Arun, V. Sundareshan, P. Pandit, and P. Sarkate, “Torsional Behavior of Reinforced Concrete High-Rise Structure with Diverse Shear Wall Resisting Systems under Seismic Loading,” Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 4559–4569, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.13189/cea.2025.130631.

A. Khelaifia, R. Chebili, and A. Zine, “Impact of the position and quantity of shear walls in buildings on the seismic performance,” Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 953–964, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s42107-023-00824-w.

S. Erden and B. Doran, “Effect of Location in Plan of Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls on Nonlinear Behavior,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. ICEES 2023., E. , A. H. , G. E. , Y. C. Uckan, Ed., Springer, Cham, Sep. 2024, pp. 467–479. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-57659-1_34.

J. Tarigan, J. Manggala, and T. Sitorus, “The effect of shear wall location in resisting earthquake,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Physics Publishing, Mar. 2018. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/309/1/012077.

Z. D. Shinwari, E. Yousufi, M. R. Haqbani, and N. Safi, “Pertinent Emplacement of Shear Walls to Diminish the Torsional Effects in Asymmetric-RC Framed Buildings,” in E3S Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, Mar. 2024. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202449702004.

J. Yuzbasi et al., “Influence of Shear Wall Area-to-Floor Area Ratios and Configurations on the Seismic Response of Tall RC Building Structures: An Overview of Adana After the 2023 Kahramanmara? Earthquakes,” Buildings, vol. 16, no. 9, May 2026, doi: 10.3390/buildings16091658.

A. Khelaifia, S. Guettala, N. D. Henni, and R. Chebili, “Strategic Shear Wall Placement for Enhanced Seismic Resilience,” in International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering, Avestia Publishing, 2024. doi: 10.11159/iccste24.203.

A. R. Simon, F. K. Hridoy, M. Fahim Siddique, and S. A. Safat, “Orientation and location of shear walls in RC buildings to control deflection and drifts,” in Procedia Structural Integrity, Elsevier B.V., 2023, pp. 162–168. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2023.06.028.

A. Khelaifia, A. Zine, S. Guettala, and R. Chebili, “Assessment of the position and quantity of shear walls their correlation with building height on the seismic nonlinear performance,” Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 5925–5937, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s42107-024-01154-1.

C. R. K. Reddy, D. P. Ravella, P. S. Reddy, and S. M. Kumar, “Study of effective location of shear wall in multi-storeyed buildings for optimum seismic response,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, pp. 740–746, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.59018/062496.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, SNI 2847:2019: Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung. Jakarta, Indonesia: BSN, 2019.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, SNI 1727:2020: Beban Desain Minimum dan Kriteria Terkait untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur Lain. Jakarta, Indonesia: BSN, 2020.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, SNI 1726:2019: Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung. Jakarta, Indonesia: BSN, 2019.

Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perumahan dan Permukiman (Puskim), Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat, Design Response Spectrum Application, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://rsa.ciptakarya.pu.go.id/2021/

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles